Top 10 clean code practices to reduce technical debt

Let’s delve into the top 10 clean code practices to tackle technical debt.

To maintain clean code, refactor code regularly, which helps keep the codebase agile, adaptable, and easy to understand. Through the decomposition of complex functionalities into smaller, manageable units and continuous review of the architecture, developers can guarantee that the code stays efficient and scalable. Also, refactoring assists in complying with clean code principles such as removing redundancy and enhancing readability and maintainability. This forward-looking manner minimizes technical debt while fostering a culture of continual improvement within the development teams, ultimately leading to much stronger, sustainable software solutions.

Efficiency and clarity are important for clean code in software development. AI-powered tools can revolutionize the process of reducing technical debt. These tools support developers by streamlining the process of writing clean, maintainable code.

For example, an AI-powered code review model can upgrade code quality by spotting issues automatically, giving tips on improvements, and even providing feedback in real time while programming. Moreover, AI coding assistants such as Amazon’s Q Developer can improve developer productivity through intelligent code suggestions that detect potential bugs and enforce best practices. This is how adopting these advanced technologies will enable programmers to write less messy code, cut down on technical debt.

Testing is essential for a code to ensure there will be no coding errors, reducing technical debt. Automation expedites the process, swiftly catching regressions and freeing up valuable time for developers to focus on refining code. Yet, manual testing remains crucial for exploring intricate edge cases and validating user experience nuances that automated tests may overlook. The selection of tools plays another crucial role in testing. Clean code isn’t solely the coder’s responsibility; testers contribute significantly to maintaining code quality through their meticulous testing practices, ultimately ensuring a robust and reliable software product.

Quality gates are checkpoints or criteria set up within the software development process to ensure that certain standards or requirements are met before progressing to the next stage. They serve as a means to maintain or improve the quality of the software being developed. Martin, in his “Boys Scouts of America” rule, stipulated that maintaining clean code is essential for good software quality over time.

These technical obligations are reduced by implementing quality gates, which offer rules for every new code commit. When coupled with continuous integration practices, these checkpoint systems enforce coding hygiene requirements and underpin ongoing improvement in software excellence. Nevertheless, even though such measures have some advantages, they are not widely employed due to a range of factors, including prioritization differences, time constraints, and a lack of implementation.

Try shifting focus from software development as just a project completion to the product care mode. Unlike projects, products last a long time, but they persist and evolve through time, thus needing ongoing care and attention.
Instead of solely looking at short-term project completion, make long-term product viability a priority. Recognizing that software’s lifecycle can extend beyond its initial development phase will pave the way towards developing flexible and scalable solutions that can expand along with continuously evolving needs and technologies. This approach promotes preventive maintenance and implements strategic improvement measures to keep things in good shape.

Measurements should be brought into alignment with the individual areas of code improvement involving cyclomatic complexity and assessing core business logic simplicity. Tools such as NDepend’s Code Query Language, which is specially developed to search and analyze the code, are used to identify the components of the codebase precisely, facilitate targeted optimizations, and empower developers with informed decision-making throughout the lifecycle of development.

Highlight the fact that tracking measurable results enables evaluating the efficiency of code changes. Teams can learn about how their efforts impact code quality and efficiency by measuring the observational outcomes, such as an increase in maintainability or a decrease in complexity. Furthermore, based on these insights, the teams can come up with new strategies to continuously improve the product.

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP): A class should have only one reason to change, meaning it should have only one responsibility or job. This promotes code that is easier to understand, maintain, and test.

Open/Closed Principle (OCP): Software entities (classes, modules, functions, etc.) should be open for extension but closed for modification. This encourages the use of abstraction and polymorphism to allow for adding new functionality without altering existing code, reducing the risk of introducing bugs.

Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP): Objects of a superclass should be replaceable with objects of its subclasses without affecting the correctness of the program. This ensures that subclasses adhere to the contracts established by their superclasses, preventing unexpected behavior.

Source: Barbara Liskov, 1987, at the Conference on Data Abstraction and Hierarchy

Interface Segregation Principle (ISP): Clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they do not use. Instead of having large, monolithic interfaces, it’s better to have smaller, more focused interfaces, which reduces the impact of changes and minimizes dependencies.

Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP): High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions. Abstractions should not depend on details; details should depend on abstractions. By decoupling modules through abstractions, the code becomes more flexible, reusable, and easier to test.

Source of remaining principles: Robert C. Martin, Agile software development, principles, patterns, and practices

Do not add new features until they are required. Developers can keep away from over-engineering, thus avoiding complexities and maintenance burdens next time. The strategy is to produce minimalistic, condensed code designs that emphasize existing functionalities. It helps eliminate features that will not be necessary in the future. Avoid adding things to the project unless it is 100% required. This makes project simpler and saves time.

Source: Extreme Programming

Make designs and implementations simple. The ease with which developers can comprehend the code and maintain it is determined by their choice of straightforward rather than unnecessarily complex solutions. The KISS principle is about keeping it simple and straight, allowing it to have shorter production times and reduce the chance of mistakes or unforeseeable outcomes.

Reduce repetition of common functionality by abstracting it. This principle forces developers to put all the logic in the center, minimizing code duplication and maintaining uniformity. Following the DRY principle makes maintainability easier since the changes only need to be made once, hence improving code readability, maintainability, and scalability.